Review USA: http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Who-Fr...y/7849/#Review

Iniciado por Derek Vinyard

Review USA: http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Who-Fr...y/7849/#Review

Esto decia ZonaDVD, de la imagen del analisis del DVD español de Rogert Rabbit:
Con dirección de fotografía de Dean Cundey, se usaron lentes esféricas para los planos normales y VistaVision para los planos con efectos visuales. La relación de aspecto original de la película es de 1.85:1.

El DVD conserva este formato original de imagen, con mejora anamórfica. Se trata en general de una buena transferencia a DVD, pero con algunos peros:
- Hay algo de grano en algunos fondos y cielos, que se traduce en un ruido de bajo nivel bastante visible.
- La tasa de bits media para la imagen es de 5.2 Mbps. Aunque no es demasiado baja, hay bastantes artefactos de compresión en las escenas con dibujos animados: Ruido de bajo nivel y abundante ruido de mosquito. Además, en algunas secuencias con mucho movimiento se notan macrobloques. También se nota un parpadeo en la blusa a cuadros que lleva Dolores en el bar (minuto 12).

Por otra parte, la imagen tiene muy buena definición con gran riqueza de detalles, una buena luminosidad y contraste y una magnífica saturación de color (no hay más que fijarse en el tranvía rojo, o en el vestido de Jessica). Y prácticamente no hay defectos de celuloide, aunque es posible encontrar alguna que otra manchita (las hay tanto negras como blancas) si uno se fija mucho.

Pese a sus pequeños defectos, este es un DVD con bastante buena calidad visual.

Y esto es lo que dice blu-ray.com del BD de dicha pelicula:
It'd be easy to dismiss Roger Rabbit's remaster and subsequent 1080p/AVC MPEG-4 video transfer with a shrug and a "coulda, shoulda been better." But separating the inherent source issues from the minor but prevailing encoding issues makes all the difference. Softness, color inconsistencies, saturation mishaps, transparent animation elements (watch closely any time Roger or Jessica walk in front of Eddie's windows and note the office blinds are visible through the characters), uneven grain, live-action/animation seams and other undesirables abound whenever animated characters are on screen. And yet almost every instance is a product of the original photography and visual effects, nothing more. Even then, none of it amounts to much of a distraction, unless you're the sort who expects every then-cutting edge 25-year-old film to look as if it rolled off the studio lot yesterday. No, the only real issue that haunts the film sticks to the shadows. Literally. At-times severe crush, macroblocking, noise and blooming render the shadows a full-fledged devil's playground (keep your eyes peeled when Eddie visits the lounge where Betty Boop works). More disconcerting is the fact that the deepest blacks sometimes exhibit a red or purple tint, leaving darker nighttime sequences worse for the wear.

That said, the rest of Disney's presentation is more than commendable. Impressive even. Colors are generally pleasing, primaries have nice punch (particularly in Toontown), skintones are satisfying on the whole, grain is intact, contrast is effective and filmic, and detail is often quite rewarding. Softness aside, a number of closeups and midrange shots steal the show thanks to clean edges, well-resolved fine textures and suitably revealing clarity, and very few scenes suffer from crippling old age. The encode is solid too, without any major artifacting, banding, aliasing or shimmering, other than everything I mentioned earlier. Could the image be improved? Yes, but only through a bit of tinkering and revising. If the animated characters were given a spit shine and a fresh coat of digital paint, and the film were then restored to match, many of the inherent issues would be significantly reduced or eliminated altogether. It would be an extensive and expensive undertaking, though, and would require Zemeckis' direct involvement to even be considered a legitimate overhaul. Still, such revisionism isn't always what it's cracked up to be. I'd rather have Roger Rabbit as is -- imperfect but faithful -- than to risk a studio dolling it up for a night out on the 21st century town. Ah well. It's safe to say Who Framed Roger Rabbit has never looked better than it does here. Fans with reasonable expectations will be pleased.

Corregidme si me equivoco, pero aprece que la mayoria de los problemas que pueda tener la imagen, proceden del material original.

En ese caso, creo que me comprar este BD.

Saludos.