Kapital, está bien lo que marcas, pero me parece más importante lo que sigue a lo marcado:

That leads me to honestly believe that DNR (Digital Noise Reduction) has been used but not in excess or to the point where it has turned things too soft.

It’s just been toned down a tad via that DNR that has been applied and it really works.

There’s again been some EE and DNR applied but it really seems to work.

it seems to have receive the heaviest amount of DNR (Digital Noise Reduction). There’ very, very little grain here to speak of but there is a large amount of detail, it doesn’t seem “waxy” or anything — by no means.

Purists will be slightly upset that DNR and EE have been used but as I mentioned numerous times above, I personally believe it actually works and pays off visually.

Es que si nos fiamos de la review para lo del DNR, nos tendremos que fiar de lo otro también, ¿no? Ya dice que en la 3, que es la que se supone que tiene más DNR, no se ven las caras de cera ni de coña.