Realmente se ve muy oscura, pero si así es como se debe ver... Para mi la imagen no es muy buena, y en bluray.com tampoco le Dan muy buena nota
Realmente se ve muy oscura, pero si así es como se debe ver... Para mi la imagen no es muy buena, y en bluray.com tampoco le Dan muy buena nota
Es una excelente edición en tanto en cuanto refleja la (mediocre), cinematografía original, estilísticamente muy cuestionable. Más que negros, eso si, son grises lavados, una curva de gamma completamente alocada, lo que define la fotografía original. Lastima que la cierta clase de Hyam para la planificación y la composición se vaya al traste por su nulo talento como director de fotografía.
Verla en una OLED es un sincristo, sufriendo de negros levantados todo el tiempo.
En Blu Ray.com lo explican, de hecho.
The Relic is destined to remain a victim of director/cinematographer Peter Hyams stylistic trappings. A large portion of the film was captured with little more than a single indirect light, leaving many scenes shrouded in absolute darkness. This may seem a touch off-putting to a certain segment of the viewing population, but I was thrilled by the lack of artificial brightness-boosting within the image, and the resulting decision to leave Hyam's original vision intact.
Pero así sé rodó e iluminó, y así debe verse.
Última edición por Branagh/Doyle; 21/03/2020 a las 22:50
"Personally, I think that as long as the artist can continue to have the enthusiasm to refine the work, they should do it. But I don't think that studios or other people should be allowed to go and tamper with something just because they want to put it on television, or they want to take it from black and white to color, or they want to have a more contemporary score on it."
George Lucas
De AVForums:
The thing about The Relic is that it has always been a dark film. Almost preternaturally dark. At the flicks this was hugely evident. On DVD, the film has often looked atrocious but the dark swathes have always been largely intact, if not exactly overflowing with depth and strength. For its hi-def evolution from Lionsgate the film, for better or for worse, is the most accurate version that I have seen on home video - but this, if anything, simply means that the film is now much, much darker than ever. This is going to be a sore point for some people, I'm afraid, because there are a great many scenes in which it is nigh on impossible to make out much of the action and the detail is often hopelessly lost within the murk. This, however, is not a case of black crush. The black levels do not appear to have been artificially enhanced, or increased in depth and solidity - it is just that the film, faithfully transferred, simply is much too dark.
Prácticamente podríamos considerarla una edición de referencia, vaya.
"Personally, I think that as long as the artist can continue to have the enthusiasm to refine the work, they should do it. But I don't think that studios or other people should be allowed to go and tamper with something just because they want to put it on television, or they want to take it from black and white to color, or they want to have a more contemporary score on it."
George Lucas
Un enlace curioso (pero sin demasiado valor) para los que somos fans de la película.
La cadena CBS emitió en el año 2000 una versión diferente de esta película. Cortaron obviamente cualquier escena violenta y hasta subtramas, pero lo más curioso es que en varias ocasiones utilizaron escenas alternativas para sustituir algunos momentos.
Lo dicho, nada transcendental, pero estas versiones alternativas son siempre divertidas.
https://www.movie-censorship.com/report.php?ID=104452