Y como no podía ser de otra forma, pasa del resto y va a su bola.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Filmmakers/...about_what_he/
¡Bienvenido a mundodvd! Regístrate ahora y accede a todos los contenidos de la web. El registro es totalmente gratuito y obtendrás muchas ventajas.Y como no podía ser de otra forma, pasa del resto y va a su bola.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Filmmakers/...about_what_he/
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Interesante lo de que Dean Cundey dejó pasar Poltergeist (llegó a reunirse con Spielberg) por hacer Halloween II.
La vida...
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Última edición por Branagh/Doyle; 10/08/2022 a las 11:05
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Le gusta el 1:33:1/1:37.1 y el scope, pero no el 1:85.1. Curioso.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
RIP, Sir Pratchett.
«En la primera reunión con él sobre el futuro de Star Wars, George se sintió traicionado» B. Iger.
«ESOS QUE VES ALLÍ SON MORTALES -prosiguió la Muerte-. ESTARÁN EN ESTE MUNDO APENAS UNOS CUANTOS AÑOS Y SE LOS PASAN COMPLICÁNDOSE LA VIDA. ES FASCINANTE.» Mort, Terry Pratchett.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Mi segmento favorito. Esa lluvia, esas batas blancas. Como Myers se sube al coche (¡el uso del sonido!), y cómo la enfermera se queda atrapada en el interior del mismo por obra y gracia del 2.35.1.... con esa mano rompiendo el cristal.
Y ese Donald Pleasance intepretando a Van Helsing: The Evil is gone!
Ultimamente leo mucho que este film está sobrevalorado. Yo creo que no. Creo que sigue estando a una distancia sideral de todo lo que vino después. Es magnífica.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.