Primeros comentarios en directo ( otros foros )
# 111 creado: Hoy , 17:47
Hoy estuve en el IFA y, por supuesto, en JVC. A las 2:00 p.m. llevé la demostración conmigo.
Solo se mostró el NX9, pero aún me permití deshacerme de algunas preguntas en dirección a N5, que para muchos probablemente se ajuste más realistamente al bolso. El N7 (en negro) y N5 (en blanco) estaban al menos fuera de la evaluación. Un N5 también está conectado y se le ofreció encenderlo después de las 17 en punto. Durante las tah'ges con el estrecho programa de demostración del NX9 no es posible.
El show fue genial Presentó un clip de demostración de 4K (lo he visto antes en alguna parte), clips de Pacific Rim y The Greatest Showman. Tanto la nitidez como el contraste y el juego de color fueron excepcionales. Las escenas oscuras en The Greatest Showman son trazadas de manera excelente.
El NX9 tiene la lente excepcional del Z1, con la cual se extraen muchos de los lúmenes adicionales en comparación con N5 y N7. Eso hace que el dispositivo sea más pesado.
Lo que encontré fenomenal fue la sincronización de la imagen. Hasta ahora, los dispositivos tienen allí la pausa de conmemoración JVC de 12-15s en modo oscuro. No conté aquí en absoluto, supongo que alrededor de los 2. La electrónica debe ser idéntica para los tres dispositivos.
Traen más equilibrio y también son un poco voluminosos, pero aún se mantiene en el marco. La carcasa de aluminio blanco del N5 I encontró muy valiosa procesada. Eso pone a Schaff decente en la idoneidad de la sala de estar en comparación con el X5000.
Para mí, queda un claro efecto deseo de deseo.
# 114 creado: Hoy , 18:28
JVC aparentemente ha analizado cuidadosamente el bullicio del Sony 4K Beamer de los últimos años y ha calculado lo que el cliente potencial desea. Según los primeros avistamientos, una pequeña revolución parece estar sucediendo aquí, después de todas las evoluciones habituales y retiros cosméticos de los últimos años.
Afortunadamente, JVC no solo encontró la conexión, sino que también agresivamente y con confianza pasó a la ofensiva. El consumidor puede estar en lo correcto.
saludo
lo del ANSI a 600:1 lo veo imposible!!!!
Yo creo que sigue manteniendo la tecnología óptica del LCOS con UHP pero en 4K en vez de 1080p con eshift y se ha ampliado un poco el DCI color con el nuevo filtro (en el N7), es probable que el N5 se acerque un poco más al DCI y también parece que se ha priorizado un pelin más la luz que el contraste on:off (a nivel de salida óptica) para priorizar un poco más el HDR.
.
Unos primeros comentarios en Inglés desde Avsforums por el forero Ran
Here goes guys,
So I attended 2 different JVC Demo's this afternoon. At the end of the second one, I was able to persuade one of the guys there to put some of our own stuff (Nigel and I).
Before we get to my impressions, I had a few minutes with one of their tech guys and managed to get some answers to some of the questions I had. Some questions remained unanswered, as they wouldn't give a straight, or any answer to the question asked.
In NO particular order:
1. Ansi Contrast has been improved and is now similar to the 4500.
2. The lens on the 5+7 are the same as last years lens.
3. Updates will be done via the USB port.
4. A completely new Light engine.
5. Iris is the same as last years, BUT the N9 will have a brand new Iris system.
6. Sync times will be cut in half.
7. Streaking is a thing of the past (hopefully of course…)
8. Light loss with the filter will be less (not sure how much less) than last year.
9. New and improved calibration software will be out shortly, NO support for new sensors.
10. Bright Corners (my absolute nightmare) is a well known issue, which currently can NOT be solved under current conditions and pricing. Asked about this "picking the best parts stuff" (which is a thing of the past now, but still made me wonder...) and they said it has nothing to do or no effect on bright corners what so ever, just lens and better contrast.
As for the Demo.
The N9 was the only projector running.
The showed a bunch of nature stuff which of course I'm not familiar with. The Iris was on Manual, because the Dynamic Iris is still a work in progress.
The screen was a Stewart 1.3 gain, 3.8M width, which made things quite difficult for me to evaluate as I have the HP (1.7 Gain effectively) screen with 3M width, so this can be a little tricky.
Brightness was Ok but I couldn't say it was great, there was A LOT of mosquito noise which would not go away, even when we turned the E.Shift Off.
I saw some serious Banding during the demo, in fact 3-4 times during this 20 minutes demo.
Sharpness was very good and there was a lot of detail which was quite remarkable.
Contrast looked fine as well, I can't say, coming from a X9500,that I was aware of any problems with the contrast.
We then switched to parts of Pacific Rim 2, which I'm not familiar with it so I have no reference. Having said that I think the picture was very good , a lot of detail , very sharp and nice contrast, Brightness seemed OK, but not something that made me think it was more than enough. Motion was fine, but it did not seem any different from what I'm used to.
After the public Demo was over I was given the opportunity to watch Skyfall at 1080P which I know better than anyone who has ever worked on the film..
I had a close look at the balcony scene (where Bond is given a shave..) and it looked very good in terms of sharpness, brightness and contrast, though I did see this kind of mosquito noise which I'm not familiar with on my unit.
As mentioned, the screen was much bigger than my own, so comparing to the picture I see at home is quite difficult, but I came out thinking that this looked very good, but not necessarily much better than mine.
I was meaning to test some 4K footage but we where out of time and I let Nigel put on some test patterns so we can further evaluate things. I'll let him say a few words about that, but it was surely impressive.
In summery, coming from the X9500, I think that the N7 will be quite risky in terms of contrast and perhaps it might become an issue.
The N9 seems to be the obvious choice for a true upgrade but price wise and the fact that this is not a 2.1 chip (No idea of any upgrade path) this will be too risky to purchase one with out viewing a production unit first.
So, I'm on hold right now until I get to test out (or someone I trust) a production unit and evaluate how much of an upgrade this thing really is.
Saludos!
En cuanto pueda hago una traducción.
En resumidas cuentas
Actualizable por usb !!!!
Visitado en sala negra culo de orco y no muy alejados de contraste del 7900 el n7
Básicamente esa review improvisada viene a confirmar todas mis sospechas y aclarar todas mis dudas.
Seguiré con mi x5000 muy feliz.