¡Bienvenido a mundodvd! Regístrate ahora y accede a todos los contenidos de la web. El registro es totalmente gratuito y obtendrás muchas ventajas.What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Borrado por redundante.
Última edición por Branagh/Doyle; 20/05/2024 a las 14:19
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Muy positiva, y bien argumentada:
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Megalopolis (Branagh/Doyle, 2024)
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Hombre!!! ya era hora de que un crítico desgrane el film de una forma coherente y utilizando el sentido común. En vez de dejarse llevar por la auto complacencia, para dejar por los suelos a un trabajo de uno de los mejores cineastas vivos que existe en la actualidad.
Porque he leído de todo lo peor, con un sentimiento de querer destrozar el film, sin tacto ni sutileza alguna. Ya se que esto en Cannes es el pan de cada día. Pero coño, que allí no solo hay críticos franceses. Que llegan de todas las partes del mundo para dar su opinión. Francis Ford Coppola no es un cualquiera, y desde mi humilde punto de vista, se merece un mejor trato, aunque su trabajo no esté a la altura de las circunstancias, para unos, sea una obra maestra para otros, o esa lo peor del año para el resto.
Saludos
- Proyector EPSON EH-TW9300
- Receptor ARCAM AVR390
- Reproductor UHD PANASONIC DMP-UB9000
- Reproductor BD PANASONIC DMP-BDT700
- Altavoces delanteros MISSION 772
- Altavoces traseros MISSION 77DS
- Altavoz central EMOTIVA AIRMOTIV C1
- Subwoofer EMOTIVA BASX S8
- Altavoces Atmos SVS Prime Elevation
Es la única crítica de Youtube que me ha gustado de momento (mucho). Principalmente porque dice ALGO analítico que merece la pena en términos cinematográficos y narrativos, y no sé queda en: es la peor película que vi en mi vida o que locura más rara, me ha encantado.
Y si, las críticas negativas están siendo salvajes, compañero, pero las positivas también. Consuelate con eso.
Los de Cahiers du Cinema y Lesinrocks (que no son ninguna patochada de medios, precisamente), la califican de fascinante obra maestra, o sea que a saber.
Última edición por Branagh/Doyle; 20/05/2024 a las 18:32 Razón: Erratas
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
David Jenkins para Little White Lies. Muy positiva.
Ignore the haters – this is the kaleidoscopic, enriching, Wellsian vision of a grand old master with nothing to lose.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Megacoppolis. Me parto con la coña que se trae con la crítica.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Bruce, no se si sabes que cuando se estrene la película en salas, además de lanzarse un documental de acompañamiento con entrevistas a Spielberg Lucas y Scorsese sobre la génesis del proyecto, su producción y rodaje, está previsto también que se publique un cómic (no se sabe aún si narrando los mismos hechos, precuela, secuela o que demonios será), que transcurre en ese mismo universo con los mismos personajes.
Vamos, que Coppola piensa a lo grande.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Pues resulta que el documental ya está listo. Megadoc, se llama. No es broma.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.