Hay cierto revuelo ya que las reseñas que aparecen en el tráiler son falsas (al menos algunas de ellas). Hay quien especula con el uso de IA para generarlas.
Hay cierto revuelo ya que las reseñas que aparecen en el tráiler son falsas (al menos algunas de ellas). Hay quien especula con el uso de IA para generarlas.
Borrado (que vergüenza)...
Última edición por Branagh/Doyle; 22/08/2024 a las 00:31 Razón: Mejor así.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Muy feo lo de inventarse reseñas negativas para intentar hacer creer que El Padrino y Apocalypse Now tuvieron el mismo recibimiento que Megalópolis.
Es que no engañas a nadie con eso y quedas como el culo.
Borrado (que vergüenza)...
Última edición por Branagh/Doyle; 22/08/2024 a las 00:30 Razón: Me comí un trozo
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Borrado (que vergüenza)...
Última edición por Branagh/Doyle; 22/08/2024 a las 00:30
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Borrado (que vergüenza...)
Última edición por Branagh/Doyle; 22/08/2024 a las 00:29
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Don, mis más sinceras disculpas () no solo llevabas razón si no que es mucho peor de lo que se imaginaba. No se trata ya de que algunas de las citas que aparecen en el trailer sean falsas, sino que el resto corresponden a líneas procedentes de reseñas de otras películas por parte de esos mismos críticos (por ejemplo, un extracto de la reseña de Ebert del Batman de Tim Burton de 1989).
Lionsgate ha pedido disculpas públicas tanto a los críticos citados como al propio Coppola, y ha retirado el trailer de la circulación.
“Lionsgate is immediately recalling our trailer for Megalopolis,” said a spokesperson for the studio. “We offer our sincere apologies to the critics involved and to Francis Ford Coppola and American Zoetrope for this inexcusable error in our vetting process. We screwed up. We are sorry.”
Esto no tiene precedentes, que yo sepa, y han de rodar cabezas cuanto antes. Que vergüenza, madre de Dios.
Vaya tela. Injustificable.
Última edición por Branagh/Doyle; 22/08/2024 a las 00:37 Razón: Mejor así
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
Automatizaciones, validaciones sin control e indocumentados al volante.
Así como hay webs que publican fallecimientos no ocurridos porque ya tienen precocinadas las noticias, listas para lanzar el clickbait.
Volveremos a lo analógico por lo militar.
Pobre Coppola, no merece semejante tratamiento. Más siendo una obra tan arriesgada y cuestionada.
Lo único que no le hacen falta ahora son polémicas causadas por terceros.
Si merece crítica, que sea solo por su cine.
Fue una chapuza, pero eso no cambia el fondo.
Y sí, a Coppola le han dado caña más de una vez. Y de Apocalypse now dijeron de todo. Y no todo el mundo vio venir lo que venía con El Padrino. Y de Corazonada mejor ya no digo nada. Y sí, podríamos seguir.
Me parece una idea totalmente certera, realizada de manera un poco chapucera.
Ufff... y yo citando expresamente la crítica de Kael
Saludos
Q: "I'm your new quartermaster"
007: "You must be joking"
_______________________
CLAUDIO: "Lady, as you are mine, I am yours"
_______________________
EISENSTEIN: "I'm a boxer for the freedom of the cinematic expression" -"I'm a scientific dilettante with encyclopedic interests"
Esta es la UNICA explicación que he leído que podría tener algo de sentido respecto a como ha podido ocurrir semejante cosa.
Sigue siendo inexcusable, eso si.
My guess is someone made a quick and dirty concept reel in the spirit of the trailer, with some placeholder examples, expecting they'd go pull actual negative reviews before the final cut, and the editing team just forgot they weren't final copy and nobody noticed.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.
La web de Tripictures ha añadido el poster de Lionsgate a la ficha del film en su página web, pero sin traducirlo al castellano.
Mala pinta...
What makes Megalopolis so strange and, for a big-budget Hollywood film, so singular, is that, just like Vergil’s Aeneid, it is at once accretive, allusive, and idiosyncratic because Coppola is attempting something very few artists have ever done: to speak from inside the imperial organism, even as it begins to crack, and to craft a vision that is both a monument to its grandeur and a requiem for its decline.