Por cierto no te quito la razon...peroIniciado por DTS_ES
no digo que todas tengna la misma calidad..DVD: The Fifth Element (Superbit)
I’ve probably made it known to our regular readers (ad infinitum, I’m sure) that this is by far my favorite film of all time. Fortunately for me, it’s also one of the best mastered DVDs ever to be produced. Edge detail is perfect (not overenhanced) and colors are rich with deep but visible dark scenes. This is one disc all videoholics should own. The Denon DVD-3930CI produced the finest rendition of this disc I’ve ever seen on my reference display. I had the fortune (for lack of a better term) of viewing this movie on its Blu-ray release – a butchered mess. The Superbit DVD is much better. Lower resolution perhaps, but a perfect master without the film defects or graininess present in abundance on the “so called” HD version. The screen captures aren’t perfect due to my digital camera, but I could watch this film over and over again on this player.
Lo que quiero comnetar con esa noticia..es que si la alta definicion no se nota en una TV de 32" en una posicion de vision "estandart", me parece que el consumidor medio..que es el que decidira sobre tal cuestion...pues puede abstenerse (lease SACD/DVD-A.. el consumidor no onta nada respecto a la "supuesta" mejora de calidad..tampoco hay mejora a nivel de "Gestion"... el formato es el mismo..distinto de lo que paso respecto al VHS frente al DVD o el vinilo frente al Cd..) por lotanto son menos alicientes para moverse..
claro que si esa diferecnia se notara mas (menguando calidad de DVd...)
Saludos![]()