Iniciado por Rinzler

Pues yo la pillaba fijo, es una gran edición y dudo haya una nueva, en todo caso algún contenido extra nuevo. Lo que dice blu-ray.com es lo considero verdad y detrás de la edición está el respaldo de Gale y Zemeckis que algo les importa y sabrán de esto y con ese precio, para mi el 2015 está lejos.

Hoo-boy, there may be some (unfounded) controversy with the image quality of these releases, so let the games begin! Let's state for the record that these new VC-1 encoded 1080p 1.85:1 Blu-rays present all three films with the best image quality they have ever had on home video. That probably still won't stop the brickbats from being thrown by some who either never saw these films theatrically, don't remember what films looked like in the 1980s, or who have unrealistic expectations of what restoration can achieve, especially in films this laden with optical effects. Let's discuss the basics first. All of these films were grainy and soft looking in their original theatrical releases; I know, because I saw them all. Special effects, even by the wizards of ILM, were still largely optically created back then, and that ups the softness quotient even more. Therefore, this Blu-ray's superior resolution only reveals some of the tricks of the trade to a lot of these effects sequences. Mattes show more clearly, green screen segments are more readily discernable, and the aging makeup utilized on most of the major players in the first two films especially shows its latex pretty demonstrably. Zemeckis and Gale have evidently been heavily involved in these new Blu-ray restorations, and it's good to note that there isn't egregious DNR applied to any of these releases, as seems to be Universal's wont a lot of the time. Some of the digital sharpening does occasionally lead to some aliasing and shimmer. Colors are noticeably more robust and better saturated in all three of the films than they ever have been before, and the infamous framing issues on the original DVD releases have been corrected. There is a rather surprising uptick in quality between the first and the second and third films, which were shot in tandem. Four years may not seem like a lot of time, but in the tech-heavy world of film, it can make a lot of difference, and the image quality is noticeably sharper, with better defined blacks and contrast, in the second two films than it is in the first. If you are expecting digitally pristine image quality from any of these films, you will probably be sorely disappointed. If you remember how these films looked theatrically (and they were frankly never "gorgeous" films even in their day), or realize that hi-def can only do so much depending on the source elements and the unique characteristics of any given film, you will most likely agree that this is the best looking the Back to the Future trilogy has ever been.

Ahora está a 30 euros. Si la vuelvo a ver en el Hilo de Chollos a 10-12 euros, igual me lo pensaría. Pero vamos, que no me corre prisa ninguna. Y como digo, si no hay masters nuevos para 2015 siempre estaré a tiempo de pillármela para entonces...