Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
a tarantino no le han traducido ni uno...
Pero bueno, lo de los títulos es ya cuestión de gustos :hola
A veces la tradución no molesta (como en la saga el señor de los anillos)
Yo siempre he tenido predilección por los originales (king kong, Alien, braveheart, taxi driver, terminator,etc se me hacen imposibles de traducir.
Y ya que se ha mencionado The Game, hay otra de fincher..."Seven" (ya el título, no se porque me da escalofrios. Pero "siete"...)
en fin, da igual, como la traduzcan, yo la seguiré llamando Cloverfield, que al final lo que importa es la peli.
28/11/2007, 00:18
EVILIOROJAS!
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Cita:
Iniciado por ImLestat
Hombre, Scoop antes que cucharada podría traducirse como Primicia.
Si, no tenia le pelicula reciente y no le veia el significado:doh
04/12/2007, 19:50
radix9
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
El primer trailer en castellano :
Me sigue intrigando lo que ahora oímos en castellano una vez salen fuera: "Lo he visto, está vivo" :disimulo
Es que ya lo habían visto antes "muerto" ????
Salu2
04/12/2007, 19:58
Rafalet
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Estoy con Lao. :cigarrito
Ey, ey, ey, ¿os puedo hacer una pregunta? Si acaba la película y ni se ha visto el bicho ni se ha dado información alguna sobre ello, ¿os gustará?
:juas :juas :juas
04/12/2007, 20:18
dawson
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
El trailer tiene voces de doblaje barcelonesas :juas
Es el mismo trailer que salió en USA antes de Transformers? :)
04/12/2007, 20:20
Corleone
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Mooooooola! :agradable
04/12/2007, 21:35
radix9
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Cita:
Ey, ey, ey, ¿os puedo hacer una pregunta? Si acaba la película y ni se ha visto el bicho ni se ha dado información alguna sobre ello, ¿os gustará?
Estoy casi convencido de que eso no pasará :agradable, porqué se verá el/los bichos (aunque sea en visión nocturna como en REC :cortina, por cierto que bien me lo pasé en el cine diosssss) y se explicará su "despertar" (con el Slusho).
Pero vamos, que vistos los 2 trailers mucho tiene que cambiar la cosa para que no me guste,vamos que ¿donde hay que hacer cola para pillar la entrada? :lol
Salu2
04/12/2007, 21:39
Rafalet
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Cita:
Iniciado por radix9
Estoy casi convencido de que eso no pasará
Me anoto este post.
Yo sólo digo una cosa: PATA DE CONEJO. :juas :juas :juas
04/12/2007, 21:56
radix9
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Jajaja :juas
Mejor que pata de conejo... ancas de rana, porqué el bicho será.....
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Pues según la primera review de AICN... (NO LEER SI NO QUIERES SABER SOBRE EL MOUNSTRO)
Spoiler:
hey harry
longtime reader, first time writer. i was at one of the Cloverfield screenings in NYC, and while the EFX and music weren't finished, i don't think the movie was that far off from being complete. anyway, i am a big Lost fan so JJ Abrams' involvement, coupled with the amazing viral marketing campaign they have used to promote the film, had me really fired up about seeing the film. just wanted to preface with that before sharing my thoughts, which i will keep as spoiler free as possible:
regarding the monster:
i don't know how much i want to give away b/c i think people are having a really good time hypothesizing about what the monster is, so let me just say that it's humongous, it's ugly, and you do see it in full view - no blair witch kind of thing going on here. SPOILER TAG i can also confirm the presence of smaller monsters (which look like the uglies from starship troopers kind of) / END SPOILER [put that in black on the website if you can]
regarding the story:
again, don't want to give much plot away, but there is a little of a backstory initially, but it doesn't take too long to get to the party scene from the trailer, and once the statue of liberty head comes rolling down laffeyette street [i think?], the movie is off and running, with NYC devolving into chaos as people avoid being caught in the path of whatever is destroying their city
regarding the movie itself:
the scares are of the "gotcha!" variety, but that is to be expected given the use of the handheld camera, which, by the way, is your POV the entire film, so those with easy motion sickness be forewarned. there are some pretty funny one liners delivered by our cameraman to offset some of the tension with levity. there are certain plot devices which require a large suspension of disbelief (esp in regards to cell phone usage), but then again, if i'm going to buy in to the fact that a giant monster is ransacking my hometown, who am i to draw any line?
overall i thought it was solid, definitely not great, and certainly not a genre redefinition. then again, my expectations were very high going in, so i might not be the best person to ask. my major critiques were:
1) it was somewhat predictable, and, as i stated before, the scares in the movie are less of the "creeping dread" variety and more of the "gotcha!" type.
2) again, i don't want to end the hypothesizing fun, but the monster isn't given much of a backstory or explanation. it just starts tearing NYC a new one one night.
that's all i got. no need to credit me on this one, just wanted to get a review out there that doesn't have everyone shouting PLANT!!1!"
04/12/2007, 22:33
Rafalet
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
¡Fenomenal! :lol
04/12/2007, 23:24
Starsky_
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Cita:
Iniciado por radix9
Jajaja :juas
Mejor que pata de conejo... ancas de rana, porqué el bicho será.....
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Cita:
Iniciado por Whedon Boy
Pues según la primera review de AICN... (NO LEER SI NO QUIERES SABER SOBRE EL MOUNSTRO)
Spoiler:
hey harry
longtime reader, first time writer. i was at one of the Cloverfield screenings in NYC, and while the EFX and music weren't finished, i don't think the movie was that far off from being complete. anyway, i am a big Lost fan so JJ Abrams' involvement, coupled with the amazing viral marketing campaign they have used to promote the film, had me really fired up about seeing the film. just wanted to preface with that before sharing my thoughts, which i will keep as spoiler free as possible:
regarding the monster:
i don't know how much i want to give away b/c i think people are having a really good time hypothesizing about what the monster is, so let me just say that it's humongous, it's ugly, and you do see it in full view - no blair witch kind of thing going on here. SPOILER TAG i can also confirm the presence of smaller monsters (which look like the uglies from starship troopers kind of) / END SPOILER [put that in black on the website if you can]
regarding the story:
again, don't want to give much plot away, but there is a little of a backstory initially, but it doesn't take too long to get to the party scene from the trailer, and once the statue of liberty head comes rolling down laffeyette street [i think?], the movie is off and running, with NYC devolving into chaos as people avoid being caught in the path of whatever is destroying their city
regarding the movie itself:
the scares are of the "gotcha!" variety, but that is to be expected given the use of the handheld camera, which, by the way, is your POV the entire film, so those with easy motion sickness be forewarned. there are some pretty funny one liners delivered by our cameraman to offset some of the tension with levity. there are certain plot devices which require a large suspension of disbelief (esp in regards to cell phone usage), but then again, if i'm going to buy in to the fact that a giant monster is ransacking my hometown, who am i to draw any line?
overall i thought it was solid, definitely not great, and certainly not a genre redefinition. then again, my expectations were very high going in, so i might not be the best person to ask. my major critiques were:
1) it was somewhat predictable, and, as i stated before, the scares in the movie are less of the "creeping dread" variety and more of the "gotcha!" type.
2) again, i don't want to end the hypothesizing fun, but the monster isn't given much of a backstory or explanation. it just starts tearing NYC a new one one night.
that's all i got. no need to credit me on this one, just wanted to get a review out there that doesn't have everyone shouting PLANT!!1!"
lo podeis poner en castellano campechano? :P
05/12/2007, 00:04
atreyub
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Cita:
Iniciado por radix9
Me sigue intrigando lo que ahora oímos en castellano una vez salen fuera: "Lo he visto, está vivo" :disimulo
Es que ya lo habían visto antes "muerto" ????
Supongo que se referirá, por lo que yo veo y ahora lo entiendo al estar en castellano, a que como de fondo se ve una mega explosión y en ese ínfimo transcurso se piensan que con esa explosión ha muerto pero no es así...
No sé, aún hay que ver algo más. Demasiado secretismo.
05/12/2007, 00:15
radix9
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Cita:
i don't know how much i want to give away b/c i think people are having a really good time hypothesizing about what the monster is, so let me just say that it's humongous, it's ugly, and you do see it in full view - no blair witch kind of thing going on here. SPOILER TAG i can also confirm the presence of smaller monsters (which look like the uglies from starship troopers kind of) / END SPOILER [put that in black on the website if you can]
Dejo si no os importa, lo más interesante que se comenta sin Spoiler ya que tampoco dice nada que no se haya dicho antes....más o menos viene a decir esto: (Perdonar mi Inglés, si alguien quiere rectificar algo, adelante)
Mucha gente está especulando sobre el monstruo, solo diré que es Humongous (creo que puede referirse a Huge+Monstruos) (Monstruo grandioso), es feo y lo podremos ver en todo su esplendor (no pasará como en Blair Witch (El proyecto de la bruja de Blair), Y se confirma la presencia de pequeños monstruos que pueden tener cierto parecido a los bichos de Starship Troopers.
Pues si es así me parece perfecto, veremos al bicho grande y a los pequeños dando guerra. :gano
Salu2
06/12/2007, 14:39
Rafalet
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Cita:
Iniciado por radix9
Mucha gente está especulando sobre el monstruo, solo diré que es Humongous (creo que puede referirse a Huge+Monstruos) (Monstruo grandioso), es feo y lo podremos ver en todo su esplendor
Salu2
Hmm interesante nombre,aunque ya habia un Humungus en Mad Max 2
06/12/2007, 17:10
Whedon Boy
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Lo peor de todo esto no es que saquen todos los días algo nuevo. Lo peor es que, a tenor de las primeras reacciones, todo esta montaña viral no tiene luego ninguna razón de ser en la película.
Vamos, que de Slusho y los posibles orígines "hostescos" del bicho más bien poco, es más, según dicen, el origen del mounstro ni se desvela (que no tiene porque ser un punto negativo, pero después de todo el marketing viral, que si Slusho que si niño muerto...:doh ).
06/12/2007, 21:28
Dr.Lao
Re: Cloverfield, de Matt Reeves (produce J.J. Abrams)
Spoiler: